By Danny Sullivan
This week’s Call Centre Expo conference in Birmingham was overshadowed by the collapse of Lehmans and the sudden merger of two of the UK’s biggest banks in an apparent attempt to stave off a similar occurence on this side of the Atlantic. Wandering the floor and catching snippets of conversation, the same topics seemed to be on everyone’s mind.
With the economy in turmoil and at a conference full to the brim with technology vendors and service providers, it might have been reasonable to expect a poor turnout, but it seems this was not the case. A steady flow of booth traffic was the order of the day at the Sword ciboodle stand, and the CRM software company notched up a record number of leads at this year’s show.
Rachel Tait, marketing manager at Sword ciboodle, commented, “This has been our most successful show yet, and it appears that there is more demand than ever for technology that can help improve customer service.”
Interesting. Perhaps the effects of the slowing economy are yet to filter through to technology purchasers at large organizations, or could it be that these companies are recognizing the value that can be derived by focusing on the customer in times of economic uncertainty?
Earlier this summer, an article in Customer Strategy magazine by the University of Edinburgh’s Frank Kirwan laid out the argument against cutting back on customer service-related spend during a downturn, stating, “Those firms that increased marketing spend or spend on R&D, product launches or activities that affected customer perceptions of value-for-money, typically saw the largest increments to profitability and market share during the upturn.”
And, judging by the noise on the floor at Call Centre Expo, customer retention (let alone acquisition) will be one of the major preoccupations for businesses in the year ahead. All in all, the signs for companies in the customer service arena seem pretty good.
By Francis Moran
While we here at in
media have long maintained there is
little difference between bloggers and conventional journalists when it comes to pitching, we do appreciate that many bloggers do not care at all to be pitched by us PR types. That’s not usually an issue for us; as an agency specialising in business-to-business marketing public relations for technology companies, we’re interested only in those bloggers who have real influence in our clients’ markets. These folks are often journalists who have simply moved to this new channel, or
de facto technology news sites, like
engadget or
gizmodo, that welcome properly crafted pitches.
Still, many bloggers are looking for a nice, polite way to tell us PR folk to stay away and Todd Defren is again advocating that bloggers be explicit about their wishes. It’s an approach, as Defren says, worth looking at.
By Danny Sullivan
The majority of smaller tech companies approach dealing with technology analysts in much the same way. That is, brief them on key milestones such as new products, major customer wins and so on, and hope to eventually make the breakthrough into one of the industry reports covering your sector.
This is still a valid approach to dealing with analysts, but there are other ways of addressing them. Beyond being advocates of technologies and observers of trends, analysts are recognised thought leaders in the sectors that they cover. As such, they are always interested in new perspectives and visionary approaches to addressing the challenges in their markets.
Tackling this does not necessarily mean using a briefing to explain in depth how your latest product addresses these challenges – you may be better served by organising a briefing where your company’s top thought leader will simply raise the concept and discuss it in detail in a non-commercial conversation.
Why do this? Well, analysts have to sit through countless briefings and often are rarely engaged more than to silently take in the information being fed to them. By hopefully engaging them in more of a discussion of a concept than a barely altered sales pitch, you may raise your company’s estimation in their eyes, but more importantly, you may bring some influence to the perspective of a key thought leader in your market. Even if you don’t receive direct coverage, your reward may be that your vision sparks debate and commentary at the analyst level… Not a bad return on a conversation.
For more on working with analysts, check out my previous posts titled Analyze This and Analyze This (continued).
