Product marketing

Work with us

Give’em what they want, not what they need

By Leo Valiquette

What is a brand? As the speakers at OCRI’s Zone5ive event emphasized this week (and anyone in the marketing or public relations space should have learnt long before they ever picked up their first pay cheque in the business) it’s much more than a logo.

Brand is the perception of your products or services in the minds of consumers, customers and clients, a perception that is created, moulded and reinforced at every point of contact with the audience you are trying to reach. These points of contact encompass everything from the treatment a disgruntled customer receives when they call a service agent, the reliability and functionality of your product and the tone of your advertisements on radio and television, to your image as an upstanding corporate citizen who is socially and environmentally responsible.

According to presenters Mike McGuire, managing partner at Wingspan Design, and Dennis Van Staalduinen, founder of Brandvelope Consulting, we tend to buy on emotion, regardless of how we may attempt to rationalize the utter logic and objectivity of our purchasing decisions. How we perceive a brand, rather than how we judge the features and benefits of a particular product, often decides our willingness to put cash on the counter.

However, part of how we perceive or favour a brand will be based on how accurately that brand reflects what we consider important, in terms of features and benefits.

For marketers, the challenge is understanding the consumer’s perspective and conveying that to the engineers and developers, while the engineers … well, the engineers need to listen to the customer-facing folks who are anything but engineers. Somewhere in the middle are the industrial designers, who must look backward from the customer’s perspective and focus on the functionality and aesthetics of a product, rather than whether it meets a certain technical specification. Apple is the perfect example of a company that has taken this to heart with a distinct brand that drools cool and exploits our propensity for emotional buying.

For a company looking to put a product on the market, the first question to answer is “What are people willing to pay for?” What they need, even what can make their lives better, doesn’t mean a bloody thing if it isn’t a product or service they are willing to buy.

The classic example that Van Staalduinen cited is the Segway, that two-wheeled gyro-balanced thingamajig from celebrity inventor Dean Kamen. For months it was hyped under the code names “IT” and “Ginger,” touted by the likes of Apple’s Steve Jobs as a revolutionary invention that would change the world and remake the urban landscape for the benefit of flowers, trees, people and puppies every where. And yet, the public at large had little idea what it actually was.

When it was unveiled, we got a high-tech scooter that did nothing that the humble bicycle hadn’t already done for us for decades, only stripped away the health benefits of physical exertion.

Nine years later, the Segway has sold about 30,000 units, whereas the investors had expected to sell 50,000 in the first month. A failure born of too much hype that failed to ask the critical question, “Will people actually pay for this?”

How about it? As you take stock of your business and attempt to chart a strategy to weather the downturn and emerge stronger on the other side, have you sought out the input of your customers and potential customers? Have you taken to heart what’s important to them, regardless of what’s important to you and your design team? Are you sure what you are planning to put out on the market is something people will pay for?

Think carefully, there’s little room for error or opportunity to beg more money from your investors and go back to the drawing board.

,

February roundup: Lessons learned from dragons, knights and Octomom

By inmedia

In case you missed them, here’s a recap of our blog posts from February.

Francis
Feb. 2: The start-up Scotts of Ottawa take it on the road
Feb. 19: Two inmedia clients among OCRI awards finalists
Feb. 25: We’re now Twits!

Leo
Feb. 5: Having skin in the game
Feb. 6: Straight from the dragon’s mouth
Feb. 13: Positive PR on a personal level
Feb. 24: How stale is your contact list?
Feb. 26: Inside Sir Terry’s start-up engine

Danny
Feb. 18: Media train, but don’t overdo it!
Feb. 27: The importance of what lies behind a headline

November roundup: Audacious, horrendous and noteworthy

By inmedia

In case you missed them, here’s a roundup of our posts from November.

Francis:
Nov. 5: Happy birthday to us
Nov. 5: Breathtakingly audacious
Nov. 18: Customer service so bad it wins an award
Nov. 26: Velocity students showcase projects

Danny:
Nov. 7: Sometimes you just never know…
Nov. 13: Getting covered by Tier 1 business media
Nov. 17: Top tech PR cliches
Nov. 28: The balance of power

Leo:
Nov. 3: When to speak up and when to keep your mouth shut
Nov. 10: Getting attention in the 500-channel universe
Nov. 21: Boldy going where we’ve gone before … sort of
Nov. 25: When the iron’s hot, strike!

Velocity students showcase projects

By Francis Moran

An application that allows users to create their grocery-shopping lists online and then see which of their local stores has the lowest total or individual prices for the items on the list was the debut project to be presented at the first-ever exhibition Monday of projects developed by students at the unique VeloCity incubator-residence at the University of Waterloo. With an objective no less ambitious than to “organize the world’s food information,” Grocerus is a nifty app that, covering a limited array of foodstuffs and listing stores only in the immediate Waterloo area, still has a distance to travel before it meets that ambition.

Indeed, the same could be said for virtually all the projects exhibited, where ambition outstripped — sometimes vastly outstripped — their implementation to date. But considering that these are student project teams that have been working just scant weeks, the dozen and a half ideas on display were an impressive array of creativity, imagination and, for at least a handful of standouts, well-engineered product development.

Some, like Grocerus, were strictly local in their initial iteration. For example, Find It Off Campus, which matches available student housing with students looking for accommodations, and Class Album, which helps students coordinate their schedules, both focused exclusively on the University of Waterloo for starters, but their founders expressed every intention of broadening their horizons once proof of concept was established.

Some of the applications are trying to dig value out of social networking trends. Gruup aims to use Facebook and other sites to bring consumers together for group discounts on products while Emoshion wants to lever social networks to help people uncover rare or hard-to-find fashion items such as limited-edition sneakers. Giftah, whose site is not yet live, wants to capitalize on the 15 to 20 per cent of gift cards that never get used by making a convenient marketplace where they can be bought and sold.

One of the more polished presentations was InPulse, a so-called “smart watch” that will use Bluetooh connectivity to convey key information about incoming emails, SMS messages and calls from your mobile phone to your watch. “Send me an email directly to my watch,” founder Eric Migicovsky said in what had to be the most original line of the day.

The judges bestowed their blessing and $1,000 on Sparknav, which will allow users to download to their phones content about their surroundings, such as directions, tour information or even exhibit details at museums, art galleries or zoos.

Two other good reports on the day’s activities at GlobalNerdy and StartUpNorth provide excellent analyses of how the students’ shortcomings in terms of effective business models and presentation skills can be addressed by getting executives and technology professionals more involved in VeloCity, something to which inmedia is committed as a partner of this fascinating endeavour.

October roundup: PR pains, silver linings and bad apples

By inmedia

In case you missed them, here’s a roundup of our posts from October.

Danny:
Oct. 3: iPhone gets political
Oct. 17: Ask and ye shall receive
Oct. 23: So here’s the bad news…
Oct. 31: I want PR, but I don’t know why

Francis:
Oct. 8: A splash of joy in the city
Oct. 9: Hostility reigns at Ottawa Network event
Oct. 14: The foreseeable future isn’t
Oct. 24: ‘My PR agency can’t write’
Oct. 30: No better time to start a company

Leo:
Oct. 1: Kudos to TheCodeFactory
Oct. 2: Old media habits will die hard
Oct. 6: All it takes is one bad apple
Oct. 10: A stick handler extraordinaire
Oct. 15: Show them the money, not the bells and whistles
Oct. 16: Mole hills can build mountains
Oct. 22: The risks of factual exaggeration

Page 38 of 42« First...10...373839...Last »

Join us

Events We're Attending:

  • image description
  • image description
  • image description
  • image description
  • image description
  • image description
  • image description