By Alayne Martell
To start, a confession – I’m a bit of an Olympic junkie. More specifically, the winter games fuel my fire way more than their summer counterparts. While I can’t remember feeling this Olympic enthusiasm back in 1988 when the games were in Calgary, I have certainly been captivated as our great country prepared to host the 2010 Olympics on home soil.
As the games got closer, it was apparent that the unofficial Olympic sport of pin trading was going to have some competition this go around; social media was poised to step onto the Olympic stage and this has become the first truly social Olympic games.
For an Olympic junkie like myself, the ability to follow Olympians’ tweets and get up to-the-second results on my mobile phone seemed like it would be my own personal Olympic utopia. But then the Olympics started. After a few days in, I am not convinced this new social aspect of the Olympics is a good thing.
Perhaps it was the prolific accounts of Georgian luge athlete Nodar Kumaritashvili’s horrific death or maybe it was the constant criticizing and mocking of every detail of the opening ceremonies (the performers are lip synching, the cauldron is broken, why are all the drunks chasing Gretzy as he holds on for dear life in the back of a pick-up truck, etc.) that has put a bad taste in my mouth. I can’t help but wonder if people actually consider that Nodar has a mother who could be reading this stuff or that the opening ceremonies are a celebration of our entire sporting world and more specifically, our country. Is there no respect in the social media world?
I put an unusual day one aside and was ready to embrace the competition with this new social media eye view. Then I realized that despite all the lists created to help you follow Olympians on Twitter, there was not a lot of information out there. I think a big reason for this is the IOC’s rather vague blogging guidelines that quite literally has Olympians scared to break the rules. On the other hand, you can’t help but think that these athletes, who have being training for years, must have better things to focus on than throwing out 140 character snippets during some of the most important moments of their lives. And really, I guess it’s a bit selfish of us to expect it.
While it is strictly a personal opinion, I don’t think any social media platform can compete with the excitement of sitting on the edge of your seat in front of your television as you cheer on the athletes going for their personal dream. The only thing that could possibly compete with that? Actually being there.


/// COMMENTS
No Comments »CJ Tremblay
February 16, 2010 2:51 pmCouldn’t agree more. About everything!
The bad taste left by the negativity during the Opening Ceremonies, the general lack of respect in social media – particularly twitter, Where people try to be funny and the easiest way to do that on a low-brow level is to insult something.
I think the social media platforms that are available to us are a perfect complement to the games in one critical way.
I think the information that comes from offical twitters whether it’s from the games, networks, or news sources, is great because we don’t miss anything and we can get all the info on the go…
Twitter and 12 seconds and Facebook have made watching the games at home alone with your laptop, or getting an alert on your cell while at the grocery store feel like you’re part of a crowd anyway, and that’s great!
Ian Graham
February 17, 2010 9:59 pmYou may have coined the term social Olympics and I agree.
Watching the 2010 Olympics and Canada’s first gold medal was a remarkable expereince with myself and hundreds of my closest twitter friends. It felt a bit like everyone was in the same room chatting and enjoying the event was far more social than I could have imagined.
You are absolutely correct about only being there could have made it better.